Reply To: Billy Posts a Blog
On 2007.10.17 at 9:04 pm Tree_Spirit wrote:
His Blog post seem to come from a more spiritual side of Billy.I seen not a whack-o post here.I seen a lot of remembrance and thinking to pass things and to future here.A very well thought out post.Billy so scriptive in writing in code like style at times.Trying to figure him out at times is like trying to figure out a age old secret in time.lol..Which we never have or will solve.
*Quote by billy*â¦
I believe God talks to me at each and every moment of my life, the only problem being that I don’t listenâ¦God does not want any of us to be unhappy, or to mourn for that which has no meaningâ¦thanks to digital media, many of us can and will be remembered in perpetuity by an unseen future, but they probably won’t bother to watchâ¦my guess is our images and sounds will seem as archaic to them as images and sounds from the beginnings of the 20th century sound to us nowâ¦so fighting for the preservation of values that don’t matter now and will matter even less down the road seems a sad waste of energyâ¦I am happy to be a warrior of light and universal logic if I am fighting for the good in usâ¦sentimentalism in and of itself is a form of deathâ¦sentimentalism in the context of preserving that which meant something to our ancestors and therefore is encoded secretly in our dna is something I am raptuous aboutâ¦if God is love is truth, than you are that to meâ¦SP stands at the center of my musical truth, and mirrors how god stands for me in the center of all truthâ¦I would hope we can faithfully copy that paradigm, and always stay focused on what really mattersâ¦we may not always be what you want, but we do have what you need!
Don’t everyone get in up in arms about this god thing.. a large part of the pumpkins earlier music was about questioning if god even exists or what that even means. god has always been present in the music. Even I seen this being a very new fan here of the pumpkins.
Sentimentalism-An optimistic overemphasis of the goodness of humanity (sensibility), representing in part a reaction against Calvinism, which regarded human nature as depraved. The novel of sensibility was developed from this 18th century notion, manifested in the Sentimental novel.
In reference to the historical movement of Sentimentalism within the United States of America during the 18th century, Sentimentalism was a European-spawned idea that emphasized feelings and emotions, a physical appreciation of God, nature, and other people, rather than logic and reason. The impact on the American people was that love became as important in marriage as financial considerations.
Moral sense theory (also known as sentimentalism)
The moral sense is often described as providing information in a way analogous to other sensory modalities, such as sight in the perception of colors. It is contrasted with the way in which one acquires a priori, non-empirical knowledge, such as mathematical knowledge for example.
One way to understand the moral sense is to draw an analogy between it and other kinds of senses. Beauty is something we see in some faces, artworks and landscapes. We can also hear it in some pieces of music. We clearly do not need an independent aesthetic sense faculty to perceive beauty in the world. Our ordinary five senses are quite enough to observe it, though merely observing something beautiful is not by itself enough to appreciate its beauty. Suppose we give a name to this ability to appreciate the beauty in things we see: letâs call it the aesthetic sense. This aesthetic sense does not come automatically to all people with perfect vision and hearing, so it is fair to describe it as something extra, something not wholly reducible to vision and hearing. As the aesthetic sense informs us about what is beautiful, we can analogically understand the moral sense as informing us of what is good. People with a functioning moral sense get a clear impression of wrongness when they see puppies being kicked, for example.